‘Natural’ Rights
Rights and responsibilities
may structure freedom,
but they may also be forms
of political enclosure,
of who is out
and who is in –
and how much in.
Rights and responsibilities
in this sense
are forms
of regulation and coercion,
often based
on an a priori
and unprovable
natural law,
of how things ‘naturally’ are,
like the once upon a time
God-given divine right of kings
eventually inherited by a larger group
of certain men – men deemed ‘white’ –
notably
during times of slavery in America
and throughout colonizations
across globe,
‘natural’ rights at some point,
at least in abstract,
growing to include
blacks and women
and now many other identities.
Clearly, the ‘advance’
has been fraught with misuse,
the concept of
rights coupled with responsibilities
used to justify
second class standing
of those ‘granted’ equality,
post-civil war blacks
deemed not ready or able –
due to rationalizations
ranging from poor temperament
to lack of education or intelligence –
to fully assume
their individual social duties.
More, because emancipated blacks
were now deemed to have failed
in their obligations as free men,
they were now placed
in a constant condition
of blameworthiness,
and thus always
under a now-legitimized threat
of punishment.
And blacks to this day,
due to such self-fulfilling
false and systemically-enforced
prophecies and rationales,
are ‘in’, but not really in,
largely free only
to be punished
for not meeting
their ‘obligations’.
No matter how crucial
the essentially ungrounded
and uneven process
of advancing rights and justice
has been,
something is being elided over:
how we should treat each other
and how we should live together
and why.
Isn’t the concept of ‘natural law’,
used to justify every inequality
for thousands of years,
and now continuing to do so
precisely under the imprimatur
of equality,
a poor substitute
for the creative act of communing –
in unbounded awareness
of one another –
to invoke, in ongoing creative process,
a living, thriving community
of equality, support
and decency?